Critics and Supporters of the Amended Act
The passage of the amended Juvenile Justice Act which treats children aged between 16 and 18 as adults for heinous crimes, brought out sharp divisions in the legal fraternity. The section opposing it felt that it would adversely impact the rehabilitation of juveniles in conflict with the law. Some questioned the discretionary powers given to the Juvenile Justice Board to transfer them to criminal courts for trial and punishment. Their contention was that as the JJB was presided over by the chief judicial magistrates of districts, there was a high probability of these children being transferred to adult courts. The dissenters argued that overly harsh punishment was unlikely to prove to be a deterrent, and more than likely to push the children into becoming hardcore criminals. This section critiqued the Act for choosing to be retributive rather than reformative. However, those who back the amended Act point to reports saying that the most aggressive among the juveni